Covid-19: Competing Theories

As we come to work out how to get out of the death spiral assoctaed with the lock-down in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. We have to consider how we have got into this state and “what can we blame”…

Theories

This examines the competing theories to see if any

1. Natural Occurance – World Slow to Respond3. Made-it Happen – China to Blame
2. Natural Occurance – China as source and kept it quiet4. Made-it Happen – USA to Blame
Competing Theories for Covid-19 Pandemic

Theory 1

1. Natural Occurance – World Slow to RespondProCon
The science proves it is a natural virusScientists says the virus was natural and come from bats.Virulent virus – highly transmittable – never been seen before, just happens to come from city with a biological weapons establishment.
The MSM would tell the truthMainstream media narrative consistentMainstream media just reporting politician statements, owned by billionaires and not doing investigative reporting or holding government to account.
It is unexpectedNo-one would expect such a large scale pandemic and so unprepared for such an event.A Pandemic has been the number 1 risk in National Risk Registers for decades. There are many rehearsals and scenario planning for this event. The last one in UK was 2017 which identified the issue of lack of ventilators, ICU beds and PPE.
Our politicians are incompentant and corruptDifficulties in sourcing ventilators, PPE, testing kits. “Emails being lost in spam folder”. USA and UK seem in lock step in their levels of incompetance. Companies that are rewarded are either “cheap” and don’t conform to specification or from Tory Party donors.
Any talk that this is anything other than natural is a “Conspiracy Theory”As discussed here. “unlike most conspiracy theories, medical ones can have deadly consequences.”Making the subject taboo in the MSM makes rational discussion almost impossible.
Pros and Cons of Theory Number 1 Natural Occurance

Theory Number 1 is mainstream. It’s just a giant coincidence…

Theory 2

Natural Occurance – China as source and kept it quietProCon
It’s a naturally occuring virus but the Chinese covered up the extent on the problem.Whistleblowers were surpressed. No they weren’t.
Donald Trump said China was to blameChina surpressed newsChina identified Covid-19 “in the city of Wuhan” only in December 2019.
Pros and Cons of Theory Number 2 Natural Occurance – China as source and kept it quiet

Theory Number 2 is just a push towards Theory Number 3, trying to push the blame onto China.

Theory 3

Made-it Happen – China to BlameProCon
Virulent virus comes from city with a biological weapons establishment.Scientists from the P-4 Lab have worked on SARS and COVID like viruses since 2015 collaborating with USA.Coincidence that this highly transmitable virus has only decide to transmit at this time at a location that has a biological weapons establishment.
China’s main site of biological weapons is in Wuhan. Covid-19 could have leaked out.The worked was acknowledged as being risky. Fears of leaks from US Fort Detrick have happened as recently as Summer 2019. Virus researchers claim that lab procedures were tight and a lab leak couldn’t happen.
China wanted to surpress riots in Hong Kong.Riots stopped because of medical emergency.If it was premeditated why was the virus ground zero in Wuhan (central China) rather than an area closer to Hong Kong?
Donald Trump said China was to blamePresident of the USA had INTEL that China was to blame.Trump is a racist, point scoring, idiot in an election year.
Pros and Cons of Theory Number 3 Made-it Happen – China to Blame

Theory Number 3 arises because of the location of the P-4 Lab. So many people believe there was a leak from the Lab that this theory is mainstream: the Chinese are to blame but it was not pre-meditated.

Theory 4

Made-it-Happen – USA to blameProCon
Alleged by China that first cases of Covid-19 recorded in old age facility close to Fort Detrrick, the US Labs responsible for Biological Weapons.News story hereThis maybe some other disease.
Fort Detrick’s viral lab was closed down in August 2019 by CDC because of a leak (and various deficiencies).News story here. Note that Fort Detrick was also the source of the Anthrax that was distributed across USA after 9/11.Coincidence.
Pandemic rehearsal in September 2020News story here. Bill Gates has a specific agenda.Coincidence. There are many such rehearsals. Bill Gates is a philanthropist.
Alleged by China: US Troops brought Covid-19 to the Military Games staged in Wuhan in October 2019News story here.
• The American Military Games team trained at a location near Fort Detrick.
• The 300-strong US contingent to the Military Games stayed at the Wuhan Oriental Hotel, 300 meters from the Huanan Seafood Market where China’s outbreak began .
• 42 employees of the Oriental Hotel were diagnosed with COVID-19, becoming the first cluster in Wuhan. At the time only 7 people from the market had been thus diagnosed (and treated before the hotel staff). All 7 had contact with the 42 from the hotel. From this source, the virus spread to the rest of China.
• Five of the US troops developed a fever on Oct. 25 and were taken to an infectious-diseases hospital for treatment.
• Pompeo wanted the Chinese not to publicize what they had found.
• The Chinese point out that the US medal tally at the games was so low that the team selected for the games had an agenda other than athelitics.
Chinese propaganda.
If the USA is to blame then there must have been an agenda! Support for a billionaire’s agenda:
Billionaire’s getting rich from Covid-19
• Supporting a Eugenics agenda and reducing world’s population
Disaster capitalism
• Excellent timing of outbreak with relationalship to UK GE2019 (Won on two slogans: “Get Brexit Done” and “our wonderful NHS”)
• Excellent timing to hide No Deal Brexit, the non-publication of the Russia Report and Acuri Scandal.
• Excellent timing to hide any further Epstien revelations (and his relationships to Prince Andrew, Clintons, Blair and… Bill Gates (even after Epstien was in Jail) and Donald Trump!)
It’s not helping Trump!
Pros and Cons of Theory Number 4 Made-it Happen – USA to Blame

But That Means…

Surely Theory 4 is just too bizarre? If the USA were to blame they deliberately set out with pre-meditation to release Covid-19 on the world knowing that it would kill the old, poor, overweight and BAME… Well for that to happen they would have to have a good cover story… like being able to blame it on China… and extreme media coverage to make sure that the story stuck. It would mean that they would have to a huge and concerted military style pyschological operations. A giant PysOp!

It would also mean access to huge amount of data! Not to determine health outcomes but whether their PysOp was working! The data behind the COVID-19 pandemic was never reliable, with test kits being inaccurate, government policies inflating the death counts, and the media focusing solely on fear-based predictions that are repeatedly proven false. Indeed, there are scientists and government leaders from other countries, including Russia, Germany and Denmark, speaking out about how the coronavirus threat may have been exaggerated.

Who Benefits?

As reported in the Daily Gaslamp, the outcomes of the coronavirus scare have included huge windfalls for billionaires, financial institutions, and corporations. Legislation being passed in response to COVID-19 is largely beneficial to corporate interests. The outcomes for everyone else have been fear, unemployment, poverty, loss of freedoms, grave risks to democracy, and death.

The Covid Event closely follows plans disclosed 15 years ago by Strategic Communications Laboratories SCL which nominally closed down after the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018. SCL’s key associates include Nigel Oakes, Mark Broughton and the Behavioral Dynamics Institute, a virtual lab led by Professor Phil Taylor of Leeds University. The techniques include manipulating people to demand the new restrictions rather than simply forcing the laws upon us.

But you cannot help but conclude:

  • the people and agencies driving the coronavirus scare have a history of unethical behaviors, including hyping pandemics to push vaccines and other drugs;
  • appear to seek long-term profits through implementation of a highly controlled society
  • Eugenics-like behaviours…

Therefore, the response to COVID-19, not the virus itself, can be seen to be the problem. The virus had been deliberately selected, refined, tested and released… all for a eugenics based agenda and for profit. And the implications that it was released when it was is also important and no longer coincidental: the timing has been perfect for UK and USA regarding the elections and for Brexit…

And for this argument to be fully explored… I suggest the following parts 1, 2, 3 and (the best) part 4:

Review and Consider

Are there any alternative theories or missing data? Update Number 1: try this…

This video is further discussed here.

PysOp GE2019

The Previous Daily GasLamp post refered to GE2019 as a PysOp – which stands for Pyschological Operation. So PysOp is a mission conducted by Pyschological Warfare (a little known part of the art of warfare but this is still as old as Sun Tzu.) This post expands upon that statement.

Firstly the reason, why a PysOp was needed was because Jeremy Corbyn together with the Labour party had effectively challenged the Conservatives in the 2017 snap election coming close to knocking them from power. However, Teresa May clung on as PM… she later taunted Corbyn over the desptach box that he’d never become Prime Minister, perhaps alluding to an establishment stitch up. Another election was obviously only another one or two years away. The Conservatives hoped that Brexit would be achieved and would do better against Labour but by October 2019, another Brexit Deadline had been missed.

Meanwhile, the establishment, namely newsmedia, civil service, public schools, intelligence and armed services (although not the legal profession, so much) were not too pleased with Corbyn. The armed forces were using a photo of Corbyn for target practice. The establishment would plan to ensure that Corbyn with his anti-Trump, anti-Israel, anti-nuclear-weapon, anti-war, anti-Royalty policies could never be enabled.

Who could do it?

World leaders in PysOps are the USA, Israel or Russia and these countries all have a vested interested in a Conservative Win in the GE. While the UK also has a PysOps capability, it is probably unlikely that a British military services would be used, but it could be done by other UK organisations… such as the likes of the Institute for Statecraft. To quote wikipedia, their “Integrity Initiative’s twitter account had been used to smear Corbyn and the Labour Party. The Foreign Office minister, Alan Duncan ordered an investigation into the reports and stated “Not only must [anti-Labour attacks by Statecraft] stop, I want to know why on earth it happened in the first place.” MP Chris Williamson argued that it promoted the “denigration of the Labour party and Jeremy Corbyn” and called for an inquiry.

If the Institute for Statecraft was not used then other, equally clandestine, organisations spun off from the Deep State could also be responsible.

What is a PysOp?

The process of a PysOP is well documented and is as follows:

  1. clearly define the mission so that it aligns with national objectives
  2. need a PSYOP estimate of the situation
  3. prepare the plan
  4. media selection
  5. product development
  6. pre-testing – determines the probable impact of the PSYOP on the target audience
  7. production and dissemination of PSYOP material
  8. implementation
  9. post-testing – evaluates audience responses
  10. feedback

So a proposed PysOp for GE2019 could look like the following:

1. Clearly define a plan: rig the election so that the Conservatives Win.

2. PYSOP estimation: the election despite being rigged but must appear to be fair and the mismatch between expectation and rigged result could be explained by propaganda generated both before and after the election.

3. The plan was prepared and tested both re-using the successful Vote Leave strategy enabled through Cambridge Analytica (see other DailyGasLamp articles how this was achieved) and secondly tested out in the Copeland Bye Election

4. Media Selection: everything! All channels to be used to bombard the public with anti-Corbyn propaganda including BBC and social media.

5. Product Development. The basic solution for this PysOp was the development of a solution that provided Situational Awareness of voter intentions. This was the solution used with Vote Leave and just upgraded for GE2019 by Dominic Cummings as described by Dominic Cummings in his blog.

6. Pre-testing. Dominic Cummings describes how pre-testing of social media ads was done on small groups then expanded out and in any case, the approach was successful in Vote Leave. Facebook allowed targeting of ads to just the people that would be most susceptible.

7. Production of PysOp material – besides the usual right wing newspapers – included the supposedly politically neutral BBC that seemed intent on creating the worst character assassination of Corbyn. Many people expressed dislike for Jeremy Corbyn, but when pressed could not be specific about the reasons why although normally pro-terrorist or ant-semitism were mentioned. As an anti-war, anti-racist, anti-zionist campaigner, Corbyn had developed quite a few enemies in the establishment… Others pointed out he did not display traditional military style leadership methods. Corbyn, indeed, led by building consensus and in the process grew the Labour Party to be the largest political party in Europe. This forming another reason why the establishment did not like him.

8. Implementation: there are multiple lines of attack here: Propaganda – full spectrum covergage, targetted ads, sock puppets and bots to retweet and encourage the right behaviour with “voter intention feedback” from automatic AI-based inspection of social media pages of targetted voters.

9. Post-testing. Finally with a complete Big Data view provided complete “situation awareness” allowed the minimum amount of vote rigging… Social Media was used to monitor the campaign and just before the Postal Vote deadline, Dominic Cummings noted that they didn’t have the numbers… so postal vote fraud was required. No doubt exact numbers of how many votes were required to push their candidates over the line (with a small margin for error) was provided for each constituency…

10. Feedback was the election result. The BBC exit poll had it spot on… but hang on… 38% of the the votes were postal vote. If, as Dominic Raab and Laura Kuenssberg mentioned before election day, the postal vote was expected to be mainly Tory… shouldn’t the exit poll be slightly different? Nope. The BBC obviously had all the intell they needed….

Everyone now agrees with the political story that Corbyn was an unpopular politician with unpopular policiies hence he lost the election. Rather than the truth: a fraudulent election fixed by computer analytics fed from illegal use of social media, automation, pyschographics and postal vote rigging. The propaganda fog from the compliant main stream media being so dense that everyone believes the narrative. No-one believes that they have been gas-lighted.